A new operation may look familiar but obey unfamiliar laws. Swap the inputs, regroup three inputs, search for an identity, and use one counterexample to stop an unsafe assumption.
Your progress and responses are saved in this browser.
The property-checking routine
Never lend a custom symbol a law it has not earned.
For a defined operation a ◆ b, test each claim separately. One successful example is only evidence. One failed example is a complete counterexample.
Safe route Write the definition → test both input orders → test both parenthesizations → check the domain → look for an identity.
1
Property vocabulary
Name the law before you test it
Not complete
⇄
Commutative
Swapping the two inputs does not change the output.
a ◆ b = b ◆ a
( )
Associative
Regrouping three inputs does not change the output.
(a ◆ b) ◆ c = a ◆ (b ◆ c)
e
Identity
One legal value leaves every input unchanged on both sides.
a ◆ e = e ◆ a = a
↻
Closure
Legal inputs always produce an output that is still in the stated domain.
a,b ∈ D ⇒ a ◆ b ∈ D
Counterexample rule To disprove “always,” find one legal input where the two sides differ. To prove “always,” explain why the equality holds for every legal input.
Match each statement to its property.
Need a hint?
Swapping, regrouping, keeping a value unchanged, and staying in the domain are different tests.
2
Exercise 1
Swap the inputs in an order-sensitive rule
Not complete
original definition: for positive integers, a ★ b = 3a + 2b − 2.
Original order
⇄
Swapped order
First output—
Swapped output—
Difference—
Verdict—
General comparison
(a ★ b) − (b ★ a) = a − b
The outputs match only when a=b. A commutative law must work for every legal pair, so this rule is not commutative.
Complete the worked example investigation.
Need a hint?
Subtract the swapped expressions; the difference simplifies to a−b.
3
Swap laboratory
Test commutativity with values and with algebra
Not complete
One swap test
The explorer accepts integer inputs. Zero is not allowed in the fraction rule. This mission compares formulas; Mission 7 separately checks whether outputs stay in a chosen domain.
⇄
Complete 1–5 audit
Every cell compares a◆b with b◆a. A cell marked ≠ supplies a counterexample. Rows give a and columns give b.
Important: many matching examples do not prove a rule is commutative. A symbolic rearrangement can prove it; one legal mismatch disproves it.
Select every formula that gives the same output after swapping any legal inputs. For the fraction rule both inputs must be nonzero.
Need a hint?
A single legal mismatch disproves commutativity. Matching examples still need a general explanation.
4
Worked example 6
Use symmetry before evaluating a nested operation
Not complete
original definition: for nonzero inputs, a ○ b = a/b + b/a + 1/2.
Swap the inner inputs
Feed both inner results outward
left inner result—
→
outside operation—
→
final result—
Why symmetry is immediate Swapping a and b only swaps the two fractions. Their sum stays unchanged. Also, for any nonzero x, x○x=1+1+1/2=5/2.
Complete the worked example.
Need a hint?
The inner values match by symmetry. Combine those equal nonzero outputs.
5
Exercise 3
Test associativity by keeping both parenthesizations
Not complete
original definition: for integers, a ★ b = a + 2b − 1. The worked example asks whether an integer m can make (3★4)★m=3★(4★m).
Current m0
Left-grouped
3★410
10★m2m+9
Right-grouped
4★m2m+3
3★(4★m)4m+8
Domain check: the equation has the real solution m=1/2, but the worked example requires an integer. Therefore no allowed value works. For example, the legal choice m=0 gives 9 on the left and 8 on the right. That pair of unequal results disproves associativity. The slider also shows half-integers so you can see the equality at 1/2; those are outside the question’s integer domain.
Complete the worked example argument.
Need a hint?
Expand each route, solve the ordinary equation, and reject a non-integer result.
6
Worked example 4, viewed structurally
Reveal a hidden associative operation with a shift
Not complete
original definition:a ⊙ b = ab+a+b. In this mission the domain is the nonnegative whole numbers, so 0 is allowed.
a⊙b+1=(a+1)(b+1)
Adding 1 changes the custom operation into ordinary multiplication. Both groupings, after adding 1, give (a+1)(b+1)(c+1). Subtracting 1 gives equal original outputs. Swapping a and b also leaves (a+1)(b+1) unchanged. This proves both laws.
(a⊙b)⊙c
a⊙b—
result ⊙ c—
a⊙(b⊙c)
b⊙c—
a ⊙ result—
Common shifted product—
Both grouped results—
Identity0
Structure× after +1
Identity check a⊙0=a and 0⊙a=a. The value 0 works on both sides for every nonnegative input.
Use a=2, b=3, c=4.
Need a hint?
Add 1 to the operation result to reveal (a+1)(b+1).
7
Domain laboratory
Test closure and search for a two-sided identity
Not complete
The identity must belong to the domain. For max on positive integers, e=0 is illegal even though max(a,0)=a for positive a. The legal identity is 1. A successful test for one a is evidence only; the explanation must work for every legal a.
A formula may be symmetric yet fail to define a binary operation on the stated domain. Closure is checked before other laws can be used safely.
a◆b—
Output in domain for this pair?—
a◆e—
e◆a—
Rule and domain
Commutative?
Associative?
Closed?
Identity
Useful witness
Two-sided means both directions. A value that satisfies only a◆e=a is a right identity, not necessarily an identity. The same value must also satisfy e◆a=a for every legal a.
Check the domain facts.
Need a hint?
Check that e is legal before testing it, and require both directions for every legal input.
8
Property studio + Test 25 transfer
Audit a whole family of operations
Not complete
Build the associativity test in small steps
Here α (alpha), β (beta), and γ (gamma) are fixed integer coefficients: positive, zero, or negative. The first two tell you how much of each input to use; γ is the constant added.
Expand each parenthesization
For a◆b=αa+βb+γ:
(a◆b)◆c = α²a + αβb + βc + γ(α+1).
a◆(b◆c) = αa + αβb + β²c + γ(β+1).
For equality at every a,b,c, match the coefficients of a and c and the constants. This gives α²=α, β²=β, and γ(α−β)=0.
α, β
Associative rule
Reason
0, 0
a◆b=γ, any γ
Both routes return γ.
1, 0
a◆b=a, γ=0
Both routes return the first input.
0, 1
a◆b=b, γ=0
Both routes return the last input.
1, 1
a◆b=a+b+γ, any γ
Both routes return a+b+c+2γ.
There are no other integer solutions of α²=α or β²=β, because t(t−1)=0 forces t=0 or t=1.
Linear-rule designer
Define, on all integers,
a ◆ b = αa + βb + γ
commutative?—
associative?—
identity—
1
Commutative exactly when α=β.
2
Associative exactly when α²=α, β²=β, and γ(α−β)=0.
3
Two-sided identity exists exactly when α=β=1; then e=−γ.
Test 25 linked operations
For this guided example, define:
x*y=mx+ny, x△y=kxy
with positive integers m,n,k, and gives:
1*2=5, (2*3)△4=64
Branch 1
m=3, n=1
2*3=9, so 36k=64.
Reject: k is not an integer
Branch 2
m=1, n=2
2*3=8, so 32k=64.
Accept: k=2
Property audit The star rule is not commutative because m≠n. The triangle rule is commutative because kxy=kyx.
(1△2)*3 = 10
Complete the Test 25 transfer.
Need a hint?
Use m+2n=5 to list positive branches. The second condition must also give an integer k.
9
Independent practice
Order and property workshop
Not complete
Current rule reminders
Rule reminders: a★b=3a+2b−2 for the input-order question; a○b=a/b+b/a+1/2 for the symmetry question (nonzero inputs); a⊙b=ab+a+b on nonnegative integers; and the associativity equation uses a★b=a+2b−1 on integers. Each question names the rule it needs.
Correct all eight questions to complete the workshop.
Need a hint?
Answers: commutative; 50; 1/2; 5/2; 0; 59; No; 10. The equation 2m+9=4m+8 gives m=1/2. The equal inner circle outputs give 3○3=5/2. For the shifted rule, 3×4×5−1=59. Closure fails because 1◆1=−1. Finally 1△2=4, then 4*3=10.
10
Objective mastery check
Exit ticket and certificate
Not complete
Current rule reminders
Rule reminders: a★b=3a+2b−2 for the input-order question; a○b=a/b+b/a+1/2 for the symmetry question (nonzero inputs); a⊙b=ab+a+b on nonnegative integers; and the associativity equation uses a★b=a+2b−1 on integers. Each question names the rule it needs.
Audit a new rule
For integers, define a◇b=2a+b. Find 1◇2 and 2◇1. Does this pair disprove commutativity?
Need a hint?
Answers: No; 3; No; 0; α=β. A single unequal swapped pair disproves commutativity; the circle sum is 2+1/2+1/2=3; the grouping equation requires the non-integer 1/2. Substituting 0 on either side proves the shifted identity. Equal input coefficients prove symmetry.
This response is saved but does not affect mission completion.
Chapter 25 Achievement
Defined-Operation Property Auditor
This certifies that the learner can test input order, symmetry, associativity, identity, and closure; use counterexamples correctly; and respect the stated domain of a newly defined operation.